International Journal of Research in Education and Humanities
Home › International Journal of Research in Education and Humanities
☰
✕
Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): April - June
Articles

Assessing the Impact of Interactive E-Learning Platforms on the Academic Engagement of Accountancy Undergraduates in Nigerian Universities

Download Pdf
  • Eze, Chinedu Gabriel, Ph.D.,
  • Bello, Aisha Mary, Ph.D.

Published 2026-05-04

Keywords

  • Array

Abstract

The adoption of interactive e-learning platforms in Nigerian higher education has grown significantly, especially among Accountancy undergraduates seeking flexible and engaging learning experiences. Despite this trend, questions remain about the effectiveness of these platforms in promoting academic engagement. This study employed a mixed-method approach, combining surveys and in-depth interviews with 120 Accountancy undergraduates across selected Nigerian universities. Findings indicate that interactive e-learning platforms enhance student participation, collaboration, and motivation, but challenges such as unstable internet access, limited digital literacy, and inadequate institutional support hinder their full potential. The study recommends targeted training for students and lecturers, improved technological infrastructure, and policy interventions to strengthen the integration of interactive e-learning platforms in accounting education.

Download Pdf

References

  1. Abou-Khalil, V., Helou, S., Khalifé, E., Chen, M. A., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2021). Emergency online learning in low-resource settings: Effective student engagement strategies. Education Sciences, 11(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010024
  2. Abusalem, A., Bennett, L., & Antonelou-Abusalem, D. (2022). Engaging and retaining students in online learning. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=abusalem&id=EJ1414614
  3. Adeshola, I., & Agoyi, M. (2022). Examining factors influencing e-learning engagement among university students during COVID-19 pandemic: A mediating role of learning persistence. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2029493
  4. Ahmed, A. H. O., & Osman, M. (2020). The effectiveness of using Wiziq interaction platform on students’ achievement, motivation and attitudes. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.690112
  5. Alshammary, F. M., & Alhalafawy, W. S. (2023). Digital platforms and the improvement of learning outcomes: Evidence extracted from meta-analysis. Sustainability, 15(2), 1305. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021305
  6. Bandura, A. (1965). Behavioral modification through modeling procedures. In L. Krasner & L. P. Ullman (Eds.), Research in behavior modification (pp. 310–340). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  7. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
  8. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
  9. Bedi, A. (2023). Keep learning: Student engagement in an online environment. Online Learning Journal. https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/3287/1267
  10. Bhandari, P. (2023). Correlational research. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/correlational-research/
  11. Bhandari, P., & Nikolopoulou, K. (2023). Likert scale. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/likert-scale/
  12. Biswal, A. (2024). What is a chi-square test? Formula, examples & application. Simplilearn. https://www.simplilearn.com/tutorials/statistics-tutorial/chi-square-test
  13. Bukhatwa, B., Ali, A. R. E. N., & Humaid, A. K. F. M. (n.d.). The usefulness of technology-based interactive methods in teaching mathematics and statistics at the college level. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1340904
  14. Chernov, V., Klas, S., & Shaharabani, Y. F. (2021). Incorporating Kahoot! in core engineering courses: Student engagement and performance. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1269
  15. Das, U. (2023). Online learning: Challenges and solutions for learners and teachers. Management and Labour Studies, 48(2), 210–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X211069501
  16. Dean, D. (2022). Percentage frequency distribution. Journal of Visualized Experiments. https://www.jove.com/scienceeducation/12584/percentagefrequency-distribution
  17. Delfino, A. P. (2019). Student engagement and academic performance of students of Partido State University. Asian Journal of University Education, 15(1), 1–12. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1222588.pdf
  18. Denbel, D. G. (2023). Challenges of teaching and learning mathematics courses in online platforms. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijopcd.321155
  19. Elite, D. (2024). 5 benefits of interactive online learning. LiveLike. https://livelike.com/5-benefits-ofinteractive-onlinelearning/
  20. Felszeghy, S., Pasonen-Seppänen, S., Koskela, A., Nieminen, P., Härkönen, K., Paldanius, K. M. A., ... Mahonen, A. (2019). Using online game-based platforms to improve student performance and engagement in histology teaching. BMC Medical Education, 19, 170. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1701-0
  21. Fisher, R. L., Perényi, Á., & Birdthistle, N. (2018). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418801702
  22. Fleetwood, D. (2023). Convenience sampling: Definition, advantages, and examples. QuestionPro. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/convenience-sampling/
  23. Ganti, A. (2024). Weighted average: Definition and how it is calculated and used. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/w/weightedaverage.asp
  24. Gupta, R. (2020). What are closed-ended questions? LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-closed-ended-questions-reetikagupta
  25. Heflin, H., & Macaluso, S. (2021). Student initiative empowers engagement for learning online. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ13
  26. Hollister, B., Nair, P., Hill-Lindsay, S., & Chukoskie, L. (2022). Engagement in online learning: Student attitudes and behaviour during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 7, 851019. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.851019
  27. Huang, H., Hwang, G. J., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2022). Technological solutions for promoting employees’ knowledge levels and practical skills: An SVVR-based blended learning approach for professional training. Computers & Education, 189, 104593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104593
  28. Islakhah, F., Nuraini, S., & Hawa, F. (2024). Students’ perceptions in learning English via Microsoft Teams in COVID-19 pandemic era. Learning Education Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.26877/lej.v2i1.12685
  29. Johar, N. A., Kew, S. N., Tasir, Z., & Koh, E. (2023). Learning analytics on student engagement to enhance students’ learning performance: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(10), 7849. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107849
  30. Klein, J., & Jackson, C. (2022). Analyzing ranked data. Study.com. https://study.com/learn/lesson/ordering-ranking-data-processexamples.html
  31. Malyhina, A. (2023). Interactive learning platforms: Engaging students digitally. Cadabra Studio. https://cadabra.studio/interactive-learning-platforms-engaging-students-digitally/
  32. Malysheva, O., Tokareva, L., Orchakova, L., & Smirnova, Y. (2022). The effect of online learning in modern history education. Heliyon, 8(7), e09965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09965
  33. Marín-Vinuesa, L. M., & Rojas-García, P. (2024). Expected usefulness of interactive learning platforms and academic sustainability performance: The moderator role of student enjoyment. Sustainability, 16(9), 3630. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093630
  34. McCombes, S. (2023). Descriptive research. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/descriptive-research/
  35. Merelo, J. J., Castillo, P. A., Mora, A. M., Barranco, F., Abbas, N., Guillen, A., & Tsivitanidou, O. (2022). Chatbots and messaging platforms in the classroom: An analysis from the teacher’s perspective. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.10289
  36. Obasohan, R. (2023). A guide to choosing an interactive learning platform. ViewSonic Library. https://www.viewsonic.com/library/education/choosing-an-interactive-learning-platform/
  37. Orr, D. (2023). 10 benefits of participating in class. Oxford Learning. https://www.oxfordlearning.com/10-benefits-of-class-participation/
  38. Prabowo, H., Ikhsan, R. B., & Yuniarty, Y. (2022). Student performance in online learning higher education: A preliminary research. Frontiers in Education, 7, 916721. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.916721
  39. Rusk, F. (2019). Digitally mediated interaction as a resource for co-constructing multilingual identities in classrooms. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.03.005
  40. Singh, V. (2023). The impact of interactive learning tools on student engagement. TagHive. https://taghive.com/the-impact-of-interactive-learning-tools-on-student-engagement/
  41. Spacey, J. (2023). 51 examples of student performance. Simplicable. https://simplicable.com/edu/studentperformance
  42. Steen-Utheim, A. T., & Foldnes, N. (2018). A qualitative investigation of student engagement in a flipped classroom. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1379481
  43. Studente, S., Garivaldis, F., & Seppala, N. (2019). Readdressing the redundancy effect: A cognitive strategy for e-learning design. Journal of Psychological Research, 1(2), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.30564/jpr.v1i2.580
  44. Suri, A., Novriana, N., & Susanti, D. (2022). Improving student learning outcomes with educational game-based interactive learning media. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i1.5
  45. Tanikwele, M. B., & Ibrahim, N. (2023). Application of Microsoft Teams applications in history learning. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 7(2), 44309. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i2.44309
  46. Turney, S. (2022). Frequency distribution: Tables, types & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/frequencydistributions/
  47. Veerasamy, S., & Goswami, S. (2022). Is online learning better than offline learning? ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1359884
  48. Villegas, F. (2023). Student engagement: What it is & how to increase it. QuestionPro. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/student-engagement/
  49. Wardani, E., Rusmanto, D. A., & Riyadi, S. (2023). Conducting online learning in vocational school using Microsoft Teams as a learning platform. Tarling: Journal of Language Education, 7(1), 8931. https://doi.org/10.24090/tarling.v7i1.8931
  50. Yu, Z. G., & Yi, H. (2020). Acceptance and effectiveness of Rain Classroom in linguistics classes. International Journal of Mobile Blended Learning, 12(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.202004010
  51. Zainuddin, Z., Shujahat, M., Haruna, H., & Chu, S. (2020). The role of gamified e-quizzes on student learning and engagement: An interactive gamification solution for a formative assessment system. Computers & Education, 145, 103729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103729
Journal Footer