☰
✕
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): October
Articles

Development of Restricted Language Varieties in Contemporary English: Social and Technological Influences

Published 2026-10-08

Keywords

  • Array

Abstract

The concept of “restricted language,” first introduced by J. R. Firth, refers to language varieties developed for specific functions or communicative contexts. In contemporary American English, restricted language forms can be observed across various specialized domains, each characterized by distinct vocabulary and stylistic features. For instance, professional fields such as healthcare, technology, and finance utilize domain-specific terminology, while online communities and digital platforms have developed their own linguistic conventions. Scholars such as K. N. O. Dharmadasa have noted the emergence of new restricted language forms driven by modern communication practices. Building on this perspective, the present study examines how recent social and technological developments in the United States have contributed to the evolution of restricted language in contemporary English. Data were gathered from digital sources, including websites and social media platforms, to capture current patterns of language use. The findings indicate the rapid emergence of specialized vocabulary linked to public health crises, online media content, social networking interactions, and digital entrepreneurship. Language used in news headlines, YouTube content, social media posts, and online marketing strategies demonstrates features of restricted communication shaped by speed, audience engagement, and platform-specific norms. These patterns highlight how restricted language continues to evolve in response to changing societal needs and technological advancements. Overall, this study demonstrates that restricted language forms in contemporary American English are dynamic and adaptive, reflecting ongoing shifts in communication practices within modern digital and social environments.

References

  1. Akut, Katherine B. (2020). "Morphological Analysis of the Neologisms during the COVID-19 Pandemic", https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2020.2.3.11 (accessed online).
  2. Al-Dala’ien, Othman Aref and others (2020). ''Morphology of COVID-19 Neologisms in Modern Standard Arabic'', Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1) (2022), pp. 111132, http://dx.doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911523 (accessed online).
  3. Alyeksyeyeva, Iryna O, Tetyana A. Chaiuk and Elizaveta A. Galitska (2020) "Coronaspeak as Key to Coronaculture: Studying New Cultural Practices Through Neologisms", https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n6p202 (accessed online).
  4. Asif, Muhammad and others (2020). "Linguistic Analysis of Neologism Related to Coronavirus (COVID-19)", https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3608585 (accessed online).
  5. Cartier, Emmanuel and others (2022). ''Linguistic repercussions of COVID-19: A corpus study on four languages'', Open Linguistics, 8(1), pp. 751-766. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli2022-0222 (accessed online).
  6. Crystal, David (ed.). (2005). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language, second edition, sixth print, s.v. "Restricted Languages". Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. De Silva, Sugathapala. (1963). Bhasha Vimarshanaya, pp. 9-15. Maharagama: Saman Publishers.
  8. Dharmadasa, K. N. O. (2019). Bhashava Ha Samajaya, new edition, pp. 119-152. Colombo: S. Godage and Brothers.
  9. Dissanayake, J. B. (2005). Manava Bhasha Praveshaya, pp. 92-94. Kalubowila: Sumitha Publishers.
  10. Dissanayake, J. B. (2013). Bhashavaka Bhavithaya Ha Vigrahaya, fifth print, pp. 44-45. Pannipitiya: Stamford Lake Publishers.
  11. Halliday, M. A. K, Angus McIntosh and Peter Strevens (1975). The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching, reprint. London: Longman Group Limited.
  12. Trudgill, Peter (1979). Sociolinguistics: An Introduction, reprint. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
  13. Wang, Xiaowen and Chu-Ren Huang (2021). ''From Contact Prevention to Social Distancing: The Co-Evolution of Bilingual Neologisms and Public Health Campaigns in Two Cities
Journal Footer